History of Japan The earliest records on Japan are from Chinese documents. One of those records said there were many small countries in Japan which had wars between them and later a country, ruled by a queen, became the strongest, unified others, and brought peace. The Japanese began to write their own history after the 5th and 6th centurieswhen people from Korea and China taught Japan about the Chinese writing system.
From what we read in the general media, it seems like almost everyone felt the atomic bombings of Japan were necessary.
Aren't the people who disagree with those actions just trying to find fault with America? Positions listed refer to WWII positions. Secretary of War Stimson, visiting my headquarters in Germany, informed me that our government was preparing to drop an atomic bomb on Japan.
I was one of those who felt that there were a number of cogent reasons to question the wisdom of such an act. It was my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of 'face'.
The Secretary was deeply perturbed by my attitude The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons. My own feeling was that in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages.
I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children. The Triumph of Herbert Hoover, pg. On August 8,after the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, Hoover wrote to Army and Navy Journal publisher Colonel John Callan O'Laughlin, "The use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing of women and children, revolts my soul.
It ought to have been described in graphic terms before being flung out into the sky over Japan.
Hoover recorded in his diary, "I told MacArthur of my memorandum of mid-May to Truman, that peace could be had with Japan by which our major objectives would be accomplished. MacArthur said that was correct and that we would have avoided all of the losses, the Atomic bomb, and the entry of Russia into Manchuria.
He knew that the Japanese would never renounce their emperor, and that without him an orderly transition to peace would be impossible anyhow, because his people would never submit to Allied occupation unless he ordered it. Ironically, when the surrender did come, it was conditional, and the condition was a continuation of the imperial reign.
Had the General's advice been followed, the resort to atomic weapons at Hiroshima and Nagasaki might have been unnecessary. Douglas MacArthurpg. Cousins writes of his conversations with MacArthur, "MacArthur's views about the decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were starkly different from what the general public supposed.
What, I asked, would his advice have been? He replied that he saw no military justification for the dropping of the bomb. The war might have ended weeks earlier, he said, if the United States had agreed, as it later did anyway, to the retention of the institution of the emperor.
Indeed, I believe that even in the form it was delivered, there was some disposition on the part of the Japanese to give it favorable consideration.
When the war was over I arrived at this conclusion after talking with a number of Japanese officials who had been closely associated with the decision of the then Japanese government, to reject the ultimatum, as it was presented. I believe we missed the opportunity of effecting a Japanese surrender, completely satisfactory to us, without the necessity of dropping the bombs.
It stated, in part: It seems quite possible to me that this presents the opportunity which the Japanese are looking for. Martin Sherwin, A World Destroyed, edition, pg. Later Bard related, " They were surrounded by the Navy. They couldn't get any imports and they couldn't export anything. Naturally, as time went on and the war developed in our favor it was quite logical to hope and expect that with the proper kind of a warning the Japanese would then be in a position to make peace, which would have made it unnecessary for us to drop the bomb and have had to bring Russia in Bard also asserted, "I think that the Japanese were ready for peace, and they already had approached the Russians and, I think, the Swiss.
And that suggestion of [giving] a warning [of the atomic bomb] was a face-saving proposition for them, and one that they could have readily accepted.The Business of War.
By Wade Frazier. Revised July Introduction. The Business of War. The "Good War" Brown Shirts in America. A Brief History of Western Anti .
Dec 18, · In Japan, you cannot buy a handgun, much less an assault rifle. In fact, even off-duty police officers are banned from carrying guns. You can buy a shotgun or an air rifle, but it is not easy: First, you have to take a class and a written exam.
On the plan to the right Ostler's Plantation is at the top, just right of centre. The road from Woodhall Spa to Tattershall Thorpe runs diagonally down from the top left hand edge and the current RAF Woodhall Spa () is on the left side of the three runway intersections.
After being taken down twice by Blogger within a single week, we got the message: It’s Time To Go. Gates of Vienna has moved to a new address. The bombing of Hiroshima was one of the pivotal events of the twentieth century, yet this controversial question remains unresolved.
At the time, General Dwight Eisenhower, General Douglas MacArthur, and chief of staff Admiral William Leahy all agreed that an atomic attack on Japanese cities was unnecessary. At first I was quite shocked to learn some researchers claim Japan exploded a nuclear bomb a few days following the Hiroshima bomb.
However, after doing a substantial amount of research, I have come to believe the claim to be accurate.